Daily Newsletter

13-year-old boy sues UK parents for sending him to boarding school in Africa

A 13-year-old boy has filed a legal complaint against his parents in the UK, accusing them of abandoning him emotionally and physically by sending him to a boarding school in Africa against his will.

The boy, whose identity is protected, contacted the British Consulate and a child welfare organization after his parents took him to Africa, enrolled him in school, and returned to the UK without him.

According to his lawyers , the move was a โ€œstark and brutalโ€ act driven by parental concerns over his potential involvement in gang activity in Londonโ€”claims the boy categorically denies.

At a court hearing on Tuesday, November 26, the boyโ€™s legal team, led by Deirdre Fottrell KC, argued that the boy is suffering emotionally and psychologically in his current environment.They described the food, tuition, and treatment at the school as inadequate.

They claimed his relocation was done without warning or consultation and under the pretence of visiting a sick relative.

โ€œThe steps this boy, not yet 14, has taken to try and remedy the awful situation he finds himself in are extreme,โ€Fottrell stated, emphasizing that the boy feels humiliated and mocked by friends in the UK for what they call hisโ€œdeportation.โ€

In contrast, the fatherโ€™s legal team , represented by Rebecca Foulkes, defended the decision as a legitimate exercise of parental responsibility.

They argued that the boy had exhibited concerning behaviour in the UK, including staying out late, wearing expensive clothes, and possessing photos of knives on his phone. Social workers had flagged his behaviour as a challenge, with instances of aggression and truancy.

โ€œThe parents had real concerns about where he was and who he was with,โ€Foulkes said, adding that the school in Africa offered โ€œhigh-quality care and educationโ€ in a structured environment free of the risks present in the UK.

The case has raised broader questions about parental authority versus childrenโ€™s rights. Mr. Justice Hayden, presiding over the case, acknowledged the restrictive measures placed on the boy in the UK, such as phone monitoring, and their potential impact on his well-being.=phoenix-browser.com

Related Posts

Rise of under-age drinking spots in Makokoba. . . . triggers child prostitution, anti-social behaviour

Faith Ndlovu and Blessed Moyo, Sunday Life Reporters THE proliferation of shebeens and informal drinking establishments that is buoyed by the availability of cheap, mostly smuggled alcohol, has sparked widespread…

Heavy rains kill 23. . .877 households affected

Robin Muchetu and Rutendo Nyeve, Sunday News Reporters AT least 23 deaths have been reported across the country, while more than 800 households have so far been affected by the…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You Missed

Seized fire tenders: Zim goes to court

Seized fire tenders: Zim goes to court

Legal process to extend Presidentโ€™s term explained

Legal process to extend Presidentโ€™s term explained

Govt consults families on burial of national heroes

Govt consults families on burial of national heroes

NSSA to increase pension payouts

NSSA to increase pension payouts

NSA set to establish medical village for doctors, nurses

NSA set to establish medical village for doctors, nurses

High-tech data collection platform for Gukurahundi outreach

High-tech data collection platform for Gukurahundi outreach
Translate ยป